Federal Privacy Commissioner on Bill c-27 news release.

US states move forward on privacy laws

Report into the 2021 cyber attack on Newfoundland health information systems released.

Privacy Commissioner of Canada announced his office is launching a joint investigation into OpenAI

Federal Privacy Commissioner launches new guidance on workplace privacy

Cybersecurity: Best Practices for Setting Up a Security Operations Centre

Blog

Using an Index to Clarify an Access Request and Reduce the Cost

November 17, 2014 - Krista Bostock, Regional Director, Health Information Managment/Privacy Officer, Sun Country Health Region

The goal in the Privacy Office of Sun Country Health Region is to assist applicants with their information requests in a timely manner, and to provide a positive experience. Occasionally, this can be very challenging and costly, especially when the request includes a large number of records, or records from several sources.

We now develop an index (see Table 3) of the requested records and provide a copy of this index to the applicant. This is very helpful when the applicant lives out of town and allows us to provide assistance over the phone. At a subsequent meeting with the applicant, we review the index and determine exactly what portions of the record are important to the applicant. We identify duplicate information and records the applicant may not need, ultimately reducing the cost of the package.

Although it takes time to develop the index and meet with the applicant, the rewards are great. The applicant is satisfied when the initial fee estimate has been reduced, sometimes by as much as one-half, or less.

If we know in advance that the applicant is requesting several records in the Region from various sites, we coordinate the request through our privacy office so we can respond in a timely and organized manner.

Table 3 refers to a simplified index showing an example of a request for personal health information from multiple health care sources. This example identifies duplication of documentation as the patient is moved through the different levels of care.

The initial fee estimate, based on 220 pages, was $245 (Table 1).

After a meeting, the applicant decided on a total of 58 pages at a cost of $42.50. When the applicant was given an opportunity to decide exactly what was needed, the cost was reduced by $202.50. In this example, the applicant decided to eliminate duplication from three sources and identified unneeded sections of the record, such as progress notes, etc.

This process can be applied to access to information requests for both personal health information under The Health Information Protection Act (HIPA) and personal or corporate information under The Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (LA FOIP).

Table 1: Initial Fee Estimate – Applicant requested the entire record for all 3 sources

Type of Fee  Calculation of Fee  Total Amount of Fees
Time required to prepare records for disclosure (redacted source documents) 7.33 hrs x $15.00/half hr

220 pages x 2 min/page = 440 min

 $220.00
Photocopies of records 220 pages x $0.25/page  $55.00
Data analysis and verification of inclusions and exclusions in the data (exporting if data) 0 hrs x $15.00/half hr

not applicable

$00.00
LESS: 1 hr free X $15.00/half hr  ($30.00)
Total amount of fees required to process access request:  $245.00

 

Table 2: Revised Fee Estimate – After index reviewed with applicant

Type of Fee  Calculation of Fee  Total Amount of Fees
Time required to prepare records for disclosure (redacted source documents) 1.93 hrs x $15.00/half hr

58 pages x 2 min/page = 116 min

 $58.00
Photocopies of records 58 pages x $0.25/page  $14.50
Data analysis and verification of inclusions and exclusions in the data (exporting if data) 0 hrs x $15.00/half hr

not applicable

$00.00
LESS: 1 hr free X $15.00/half hr  ($30.00)
Total amount of fees required to process access request:  $42.50

 

Table 3: Index of 3 Source Documents

Acute Care – Site A (Admission May 1 – June 30, 2014)
Source Section Source document Name # pages Document Dates Duplicate (Y) Applicant does not want copy
 A1 Therapies progress notes 18 May 1 – June 30, 2014 18
 A2  Guardianship form 6 May 15, 2014 6
 A3 Cognitive assessment form 25 May 3, 2014 25
 A4 Therapies assessment 15 May 8, 2014
A5 History and physical 2 May 1, 2014
A6 Physician progress notes 10 May 1 – June 30, 2014
A7  Discharge summary 2 June 30, 2014
A8 Lab results 20 May 1 – June 30, 2014 20
A9 Physician orders 6 May 1 – June 30, 2014
A10 Nursing progress notes 20 May 1 – June 30, 2014 20
Totals:   124     89
Respite – Site R (Admission June 30 – July 15, 2014
Source Section Source document Name # pages Document Dates Duplicate (Y) Applicant does not want copy
 R1 Guardianship form 6 May 15, 2014 Yes (see A2) 6
R2 Therapies assessment 15 May 8, 2014 Yes (see A4) 15
R3 Admission agreement 5 June 30, 2014
R4 Discharge summary (Acute care) 2 June 30, 2014 Yes (see A7) 2
R5 Physician progress notes 5 June 30 – July 15, 2014
R6 Nursing progress notes 10 June 30 – July 15, 2014 10
R7 Interagency transfer note 2 July 15, 2014
Totals: 45 33
LTC – Site L (Admission July 15 – July 30, 2014)
Source Section Source document Name # pages Document Dates Duplicate (Y) Applicant does not want copy
L1 Guardianship form 6 May 15, 2014 Yes (see A2) 6
L2 Therapies assessment 15 May 8, 2014 Yes (see A4) 15
L3 Discharge summary (acute care) 2 June 30, 2014 Yes (see A7) 2
L4 Interagency transfer note (respite) 2 July 15, 2014 Yes (see R7) 2
L5 Admission agreement LTC 5 July 15, 2014
L6 Physician orders 6 July 15 – 30, 2014
L7 Nursing progress notes 15 July 15 – 30, 2014 15
Totals: 51 40

 

Total pages form all 3 sources: 220 Total pages to be eliminated from original request: 162

 

Categories: BlogTags: , , , , ,

Back to Blog